Archive for January, 2010

Gold-plated with Chain Masonic Tie Tack

Product Description

Product Details

Specifications: Polished Solid Textured
Precious Metal Type: Non Metal
Quantity in Stock: 4
More >>

Gold-plated with Chain Masonic Tie Tack

  • Share/Bookmark

31

01 2010

Insights – Masonic by Gerald Ivey 8″x10″ Art Print Poster

Product Description
Insights – Masonic by Gerald Ivey

Image Size – 8″ x 10″ Paper Size – 8″ x 10″

Fine Art Reproduction on High Quality Art Paper

Mint (pristine/new) Condition

Retails in Galleries for $12.00 or more!… More >>

Insights – Masonic by Gerald Ivey 8″x10″ Art Print Poster

  • Share/Bookmark

28

01 2010

Name of God

A reverential allusion to the name of God, in some especial and peculiar form, is to be found in the doctrines and ceremonies of almost all nations. This ineffable or unutterable name was respected by the Jews under the sacred form of the word Jehovah. Among the Druids, the three letters I. O. W. constituted the name of Deity. They were never pronounced, says Giraldus Cambrensis, but another and less sacred name was substituted for them.

Each letter was a name in itself. The first is the Word, at the utterance of which in the beginning the world burst into existence; the second is the Word, whose sound still continues, and by which all things remain in existence; the third is the Word, by the utterance of which all things will be consummated in happiness, forever approaching to the immediate presence of the Deity. The analogy between this and the past, press ent and future significations contained in the Jewish Tetragrammaton will be evident.

Among the Mohammedans there is a science called Ism Allah, or the science of the name of God. “They pretend,” says Niebuhr, “that God is the locus of this science, and Mohammed the key; that, consequently, none but Mohammedans can attain it; that it discovers what passes in different countries; that it familiarizes the possessors with the genii, who are at the command of the initiated, and who instruct them; that it places the winds and the seasons at their disposal, and heals the bites of serpents, the lame, the maimed, and the blind.”

In the chapter of the Koran en titled Araaf, it is written: “God has many excellent names. Invoke him by these names, and separate your selves from them who give him false names.” The Mohammedans believe that God has ninety-nine names, which, with that of Allah, makes one hundred; and, therefore, their chaplets or rosaries are composed of one hundred beads, at each of which they invoke one of these names; and there is a tradition, that whoever frequently makes this invocation will find the gates of Paradise open to him. With them Allah is the Ism al adhem, the Great Name, and they bestow upon it all the miraculous virtues which the Jews give to the Tetragrammaton.

This, they say, is the name that was engraven on the stone which Japheth gave to his children to bring down rain from heaven; and it was by virtue of this name that Noah made the ark float on the waters, and governed it at will, without the aid of oars or rudder. Among the Hindus there was the same veneration of the name of God, as is evinced in their treatment of the mystical name Aum. The “Institutes of Menu” continually refer to the peculiar efficacy of this word, of which it is said, “All rites ordained in the Veda oblations to fire, and solemn sacrifices pass away; but that which passes not away is the syllable Aum, thence called aishara, since it is a symbol of God, the Lord of created beings.”

There was in every ancient nation a sacred name given to the highest god of its religious faith, besides the epithets of the other and subordinate deities.

The old Aryans, the founders of our race, called their chief god Dyaus, and in the Vedas we have the invocation to Dyaus Pitar (Pita), which is the same as the Greek Zev cramp, and the Latin, Jupiter, all meaning the Heaven-Father, and at once reminding us of the Christian invocation to “Our Father which art in heaven.”

There is one incident in the Hindu mythology which shows how much the old Indian heart yearned after this expression of the nature of Deity bv a name.

There was a nameless god, to whom, as the “source of golden light,” there was a worship. This is expressed in one of the Veda hymns, where the invocation in every stanza closes with the exclamation, “Who is the god to whom we shall offer our sacrifice?”

Nor, says Bunsen (God in History i, 302), “the Brahmanic expositors must needs find in every hvmn the name of a god who is invoked in it, and so, in this case. their have actually invented a grammatical divinity the god Who.”

What more pregnant testimony could we have of the tendency of man to seek a knowledge of the Divine nature in the expression of a name?

The Assyrians worshiped Assur, or Asarac, as their chief god. On an obelisk, taken from the palace of Nimrod, we find the inscription, “to Asarac, the Great Lord, the King of all the great gods.”

Of the veneration of the Egyptians for the name of their supreme god, we have a striking evidence in the writings of Herodotus, the Father of History, as he has been called, who, during a visit to Egypt. was initiated into the Osirian mysteries. Speaking of these initiations he says (book u, chapter 171), “the Egyptians represent by night his sufferings, whose name I refrain from mentioning.” It was no more lawful among the Egyptians than it was among the Jews, to give utterance aloud to that Holy Name.

At Byblos the Phenicians worshiped Eliun, the Most High God. From him was descended El, whom Philo identifies with Saturn, and to whom he traces the Hebrew Elohim.

Of this El, Max Muller says that there was undeniably a primitive religion of the whole Semitic race, and that the Strong One in Heaven was invoked under this name by the ancestors of the Semitic races, before there were Babylonians in Babylonia, Phenicians in Sidon and Tyre, or Jews in Mesopotamia and Jerusalem. If so, then the Mosaic adoption of Jehovah, with its more precise teaching of the Divine essence, was a step in the progress to the knowledge of the Divine Truth. In China there is an infinite variety of names of elemental powers, and even of ancestral spirits, who b are worshiped as subordinate deities; but the ineffable name is Tien, compounded of the two signs for great and one, and which, the Imperial Dictionary tells us, signifies “The Great One—He that dwells on high, and regulates all below.”

Drummond (Origines) claimed that Abaur was the name of the Supreme Deity among the ancient Chaldeans. It is evidently the Hebrew signifies “The Father of Light.” The Scandinavians had twelve subordinate gods, but their chief or supreme deity was Al-Fathr, or the All Father.

Even among the Red Men of America we find the idea of an invisible deity, whose name was to be venerated.

Garcilasso de la Vega tells us that while the Peruvians paid public worship to the sun, it was but as a symbol of the Supreme Being, whom they called, Pachacamac, a word meaning the soul of the world, and which was so sacred that it was spoken only with extreme dread.

The Jews had, besides the Tetragrammaton or fourlettered name, two others: one consisting of twelve and the other of forty-two letters. But Maimonides, in his More Nevochim (part i, elxii), remarks that it is impossible to suppose that either of these constituted a single name, but that each must have been composed of several words, which must, however, have heen significant in making man approximate to a knowledge of the true essence of God. The Cabalistical book called the Sohar confirms this when it tells us that there are ten names of God mentioned in the Bible, and that when these ten names are combined into one word, the number of the letters amounts to forty-two.

But the Talmudists, although they did not throw around the forty-two-lettered name the sanctity of the Tetragrammaton, prescribed that it should be communicated only to men of middle age and of virtuous habits, and that its knowledge would confirm the n as heirs of the future as well as the present life. The twelve lettered name, although once common, became afterward occult; and when, on the death of Simon I, the priests ceased to use the Tetragrammaton, they were accustomed to bless the people with the name of twelve letters. Maimonides very wisely rejects the idea that any power was derived from these letters or their pronunciation, and claims that the only virtue of the names consisted in the holy ideas expressed by the words of which they were composed.

The following are the ten Cabalistic names of God, corresponding to the ten Sephiroth:

Eheyeh

Jah

Jehovah

E1

Eloah

Elohim

Jehovah Sabaoth

Elohim Sabaoth

Elhi

Adonai

Lanzi extends his list of names to twenty-six, which, with their signification, are as follows:

At Aleph and Tau, that is, Alpha and Omega. A name figurative of the Tetragrammaton.

Ihoh: Eternal, absolute principle of creation.

Hoh: Destruction. the male and female principle, the author and regulator of time and motion.

Jah: Lord and remunerator.

Oh: Severer and punisher.

Jao: Author of life.

Azazel: Author of death.

Jao-Sabaoth: God of the co-ordinations of loves and hatreds. Lord of the solstices and the equinoxes.

Ehie: The Being, the Ens.

El: The First Cause. The principle or beginning of all things.

Elo-hi. The Good Principle.

Elo-ho: The Evil Principle.

El-raccum: The Succoring Principle.

El-cannum: The Abhoring Principle.

Ell: The Most Luminous.

II : The Omnipotent.

Ellohim: The Omnipotent and Beneficent.

Elohim: The Most Beneficent.

Elo: The Sovereign, the Excelsus.

Adon: The Lord, the Dominator.

Etoi: The Illuminator, the Most Effulgent.

Adonai: The Most Firm, the Strongest.

Elion: The Most Sigh.

Shaddai: The Most Victorious.

Yeshurun: The Most Generous.

Noil: The Most Sublime.

Like the Mohammedan Ism Allah, Freemasonry presents us as its most important feature with this science of the names of God. But here it elevates itself above Talmudical and Rabbinical reveries, and becomes a symbol of Divine Truth. The names of God were undoubtedly intended originally to be a means of communicating the knowledge of God himself. The name was, from its construction and its literal powers, used to give some idea, however scanty, in early times, of the true nature and essence of the Deity. The Ineffable Name was the symbol of the unutterable sublimity and perfection of truth which emanate from the Supreme God, while the subordinate names were symbols of the subordinate manifestations of truth. Freemasonry has availed itself of this system, and, in its reverence for the Divine Name, indicates its desire to attain to that truth as the ultimate object of all its labor. The significant words of the Masonic system, which describe the names of God wherever they are found, are not intended merely as words of recognition, but as indices, pointing—like the Symbolic Ladder of Jacob of the First Degree, or the Winding Stairs of the Second, or the Three Gates of the Third—the way of progress from darkness to light, from ignorance to knowledge, from the lowest to the highest conceptions of Divine Truth. And this is, after all, the real object of all Masonic science.

  • Share/Bookmark

27

01 2010

Duncan’s Ritual of Freemasonry

Product Description
A must for every Mason, this volume serves as a guide for neophytes as well as a reference for the initiated. Its revelations of closely guarded secrets make it valuable even to readers outside the fraternity. More than 100 illustrations accompany simple, accurate explanations of gestures, symbols, tools, and terms.
More >>

Duncan’s Ritual of Freemasonry

  • Share/Bookmark

27

01 2010

Macbenac

This word is capable of at least two interpretations.

1. A significant word in the Third Degree according to the French Rite and some other Rituals (see Mac).

2. In the Order of the Beneficent Knights of the Holy City, the Recipiendary, or Novice, is called Macbenac.

  • Share/Bookmark

25

01 2010

Laborers, Statutes of

Toward the middle of the fourteenth century, a plague of excessive virulence, known in history as the Black Death, invaded Europe, and swept off fully one-half of the inhabitants. The death of s0 many workmen had the effect of advancing the price of all kinds of labor to double the former rate. In England, the Parliament, in 1350, enacted a Statute, which was soon followed by others, the object of which was to regulate the rate of wages and the price of the necessaries of life.  Against these enactments, which were called the Statutes of Laborers, the artisans of all kinds rebelled; but the most active opposition was found among the Masons, whose organization, Doctor Mackey asserts, being better regulated, was more effective (see Freemason).

In 1360, Statutes were passed forbidding their “Congregations, Chapters, Regulations, and Oaths,” which were from time to time repeated, until the third year of the reign of Henry VI, 1425 A.D., when the celebrated Statute entitled “Masons shall not confederate themselves in Chapters and Congregations,” was enacted in the following words:

Whereas, by yearly Congregations and Confederacies made by the Masons in their General Assemblies, the good course and effect of the Statutes for Laborers be openly violated and broken, in subversion of the law, and to the great damage of all the Commons, our said sovereign lord and King, willing in this case to provide a remedy, by the advice and assent aforesaid, and at the special request of the Commons, hath ordained and established that such chapters and congregations shall not be hereafter holden; and if any such be made, they that cause such Chapters and Congregations to be assembled and holden, if they thereof be convicted, shall be judged for felons. and that the other Masons that come to such Chapters and Congregations be punished by imprisonment of their bodies and make fine and ransom at the king’s will.

All the Statutes of Laborers were repealed in the fifth year of Elizabeth; and Lord Coke gave the opinion that this act of Henry VI became, in consequence, “of no force or effect”; a decision which led Anderson, very absurdly, says Brother Mackey, to suppose that “this most learned judge really belonged to the ancient Lodge, and was a faithful Brother” (Constitutions, 1723, page 57); as if it required a judge to be a Freemason to give a just judgment concerning the interests of Freemasonry.

  • Share/Bookmark

25

01 2010

Sterling Silver Antiqued Masonic Ring – Size 9

Product Description
Sterling Silver Antiqued Masonic Ring – Size 9 – 5.3 Grams in Sterling Silver – – Product Attributes: – Antique finish — Solid – – JewelryWeb Style: QTR75283SS – FREE gift-ready jewelry box… More >>

Sterling Silver Antiqued Masonic Ring – Size 9

  • Share/Bookmark

25

01 2010

Bleeding Heart Studs – Alchemy Gothic Earrings

Product Description
Dripping with bloody crystals, betraying the emotional grief inside, with matching necklace. 100% Britannia pewter. Hand made in England. Authentic Alchemy of England brand merchandise…. More >>

Bleeding Heart Studs – Alchemy Gothic Earrings

  • Share/Bookmark

25

01 2010

Kadosh: – knight, philosophic, of the Jesuits, prince, prince of death,

KADOSH
called also the Holly Man. The French phrase is Kadosch ou l’Homme Saint. The Tenth and last Degree of the Rite of Martinism.

KADOSH, GRAND, ELECT KNIGHT
The Sixty-fifth Degree of the Rite of Mizraim

KADOSH, KNIGHT
The Thirtieth Degree of the Scottish Rite

KADOSH OF THE JESUITS
According to Thory (Acta Latomorum i, page 320) this Degree is said to have been invented by the Jesuits of the College of Clermont. The statement is not well supported. De Bonneville’s Masonic Chapter of Clermont was probably, either with or without design, confounded with the Jesuitical College of Clermont (see Jesuits).

KADOSH, PHILOSOPHIC
A modification of the original Kadosh, for which it has been substituted and adopted by the Grand Orient of France. The military character of the Order is abandoned, and the Philo sophic Eadosh wear no swords. Their only weapon is the Word.

KADOSH, PRINCE
A Degree of the collection of Pyron

KADOSH PRINCE OF DEATH
The Twentyseventh Degree of the Rite of Mizraim

  • Share/Bookmark

24

01 2010

Jacobins

A political sect that sprang up in the beginning of the French Revolution, and which have origin to the Jacobin clubs, so well known as having been the places where the leaders of the Revolution concocted their plans for the abolition of the monarchy and the aristocracy. Lieber says that it is a most surprising phenomenon that “so large a body of men could be found uniting rare energy with execrable vice, political madness, and outrageous cruelty, committed always in the name of virtue.” Barruel, in his History de Jacobinisme, and Robinson, in his Proofs of a Conspiracy, both endeavor to prove that there was a coalition of the revolutionary conspirators with the Illuminati and the Freemasons which formed the Jacobin Clubs, those Bodies being, as they contend, only Masonic Lodges in disguise.

The falsity of these charges will be evident to anyone who reads the history of French Freemasonry during the Revolution, and more especially during that part of the period known as the Reign of Terror, when the Jacobin Clubs were in most vigor. The Grand Orient, in 1788, declared that a politico-Masonic work, entitled Les Jesuites chassés de la Maçonnerie et leur Poignard brisé par les Maçons, meaning The Jesuits driven from Freemasonry and their weapon broken by the Freemasons, was the production of a perverse mind, prepared as a poison for the destruction of Freemasonry, and ordered it to be burned.

During the Revolution, the Grand Orient suspended its labors, and the Lodges in France were dissolved; and in 1793, the Duke of Orleans, the head of the Jacobins, who was also, unfortunately, Grand Master of the French Freemasons, resigned the latter position, assigning as a reason that he did not believe that there should be any mystery nor any Secret Society in a Republic. It is evident that the Freemasons, as an Order, held themselves aloof from the political contests of that period.

  • Share/Bookmark

23

01 2010


Powered by Yahoo! Answers